Update: It seems DC Gossip is a bad loser too. Today she stated that the AG's office must be in cahoots with the PL Deputy Leader if the AG backed the PL stance? Now that's democratic.

Michael Fazon clearly didn't agree with her and branded the event on Friday as the most interesting of the day! The Times appeared to agree with DC Gossip though. They relegated this landmark judgement to page 3 and on page 1 told us how the divorce debate was conducted with dignity, how the deficit may be going down, with a back page talking point attacking Joseph Muscat for commenting on Dr. Gonzi's other vote buying scandal..promising tax cuts which didn't materialise.

In other words The Times acted as the wall again and didn't give the AGs decision front page prominence as it would have done if the PL were in government perhaps? This bias should stop.

Earlier: It appears the A.G. has today struck a blow at the credibility of The Malta Independent's leading columnist. Only yesterday she attempted to rubbish the credibility of those who made cogent arguments about vote buying in the last election. The A.G.'s arguments published today mirror the arguments made by the PL's Deputy Leader in Parliament.

Dc Gossip wrong again. Whose credibility is in tatters? Perhaps the Independent should check the views of their columnist for fact, and dare we say independence too? Or read our own most read leader called "No Pradas in our polling booths PM" before they rushed to print her biased hot air.

Bottom line the A.G. is appealing the judgement given in the vote buying case. Watch this space...